21.2.04
IRAQIS WILL DECIDE WHO IS ELECTED PRESIDENT IN THE U.S. in 2004
Mark my word...from the swami of the IB-sphere. Poetic justice still exists.
Check Sistani, der speigel interview...(here's one link to a transl. by Professor Cole of Sistani's interview, teaser only...but you'll get the point.) [i.e. if there are riots and killing in the streets of iraqs cities in september and october, bush doesn't get elected. and honestly, i've always thought (besides one or two moments of hope) that he would be re-elected. but now...very interesting.]
Certain Iraqi voices around me mutter that they will kill Sistani. BUT that would be the most foolish thing to do...esp. if the U.S. is worried about Iran and Khomeni-ism. (THEY SHOULD BE GUARDING HIM.) What they had in IRAN on 20 FEBrUARY were NOT legitimate democratic elections. What Sistani wants is just that, DIRECT ELECTIONS...one man, one vote. But he also wants the UN to be involved, passing a resolution making the process more legitimate to Iraqis and the world community. Calling on Sharia, is a new one for him. So what's the result? Sistani is beating USA at its own game...politics.
Isn't it all so ironic??? An invading force (USA), occupies a place (IRAQ), then the people of that place(IRAQ) have the power to decide who stays in power in the place (USA) that invaded that other place(IRAQ) to begin with. One breath...in........ out........ WHY DOES DEMOCRACY IN IRAQ THREATEN THE US?
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
BOO-YAH-KAH-SHAH!!!
Lim.
Check Sistani, der speigel interview...(here's one link to a transl. by Professor Cole of Sistani's interview, teaser only...but you'll get the point.) [i.e. if there are riots and killing in the streets of iraqs cities in september and october, bush doesn't get elected. and honestly, i've always thought (besides one or two moments of hope) that he would be re-elected. but now...very interesting.]
Certain Iraqi voices around me mutter that they will kill Sistani. BUT that would be the most foolish thing to do...esp. if the U.S. is worried about Iran and Khomeni-ism. (THEY SHOULD BE GUARDING HIM.) What they had in IRAN on 20 FEBrUARY were NOT legitimate democratic elections. What Sistani wants is just that, DIRECT ELECTIONS...one man, one vote. But he also wants the UN to be involved, passing a resolution making the process more legitimate to Iraqis and the world community. Calling on Sharia, is a new one for him. So what's the result? Sistani is beating USA at its own game...politics.
Isn't it all so ironic??? An invading force (USA), occupies a place (IRAQ), then the people of that place(IRAQ) have the power to decide who stays in power in the place (USA) that invaded that other place(IRAQ) to begin with. One breath...in........ out........ WHY DOES DEMOCRACY IN IRAQ THREATEN THE US?
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
BOO-YAH-KAH-SHAH!!!
Lim.
0 comments:
Post a Comment